byndw8的部落格

Think you are exploit the echt election grades when you examine the daylight news? Think once more. You in all probability simply cognize that the networks anecdote their "projections" longitudinal earlier the votes are counted, and sometimes until that time the place are even closed. But what you may not cognise is that they don't story the apodeictic results of elections, even after all the votes are counted.

More on that in a moment, but original I have to enlighten you astir a phone box christen I latterly standard. It was a computing machine programme business me, wearisome to history my responses to a governmental scrutiny on abundant unrestricted issues. Never heed what the chill out of the questions were: the firstborn one points forthwith to the indisputable catch here. It was, "Do you brood over yourself a Republican or Democrat?"

What rigged question! I don't view myself to be either, so I have to lie or be excluded from the study. This was a overall national assessment poll, not one intended for use entirely by the organizers of republicans or democrats. You can bet that they reported those results on the evening report or in newspapers, as envoy of the overall opinions of the semipublic - not basically those who are democrats or republicans.

The interrogation points out a leading weak spot in the news newspaper journalism on ambassadorial issues, which is the premise that here are retributory two embassy parties in this region. Do you if truth be told know how many an political parties get hundreds of thousands of votes in this country in respectively election? How would you if none of the word origin report on them.

This posit that we singular have two critical parties is unwaveringly ingrained in our media. This is why the results of elections are not accurately according. The successive real account shows how this happens.

Years ago, looking at the tube news amount of money of the 1980 head of state election, I started to observe thing amusing. News programme after word program reported that Reagan got 55% of the vote, and Carter 45%. You can see that this adds up to 100%, so what happened to the separate votes?

Libertarians, Independents (like John Anderson) and others got terminated 7 cardinal votes, or 9% of all votes cast. Oh, and by the way, Reagan had 50% of the votes, and Carter 41%. To be trustworthy roughly it, the reporters could have at tiniest said, "Of the votes we write off as important, Reagan got 55%, and Carter got 45%."

There was no ruse present. The word producers were conscionable accumulation up solely the votes for the two principal parties and dividing to get his percentages. The reality that they would bury or take out the other than votes is simply mood of how grand an implied premiss can be.

Of class here are other than embassy parties in this state. Not newspaper journalism their ballot tallies restrictions their exposure, and helps to hold on to them from budding. We may well have many factual electable alternatives to the Republicans and Democrats if more than associates knew that they existed.

Unfortunately, these kinds of "accidental" lies almost election grades maintain to be told on the television word programs nowadays.